Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> This is a heavily version of patches we carried in Git for Windows for
> way too long without submitting them upstream.
>
> In this iteration, I also claim authorship for the patch because by now
> Kusma's changes were so contorted and mutilated beyond recognition by me
> that I do not want anybody to blame him for my sins.
OK, so what do you want me to do with this "heavily modified
version"? Earlier you responded:
> I have a huge preference for a code that has been production for
> years over a new code that would cook at most two weeks in 'next'.
I agree. However, it does not fill me with confidence that we did not
catch those two bugs earlier. Even one round of reviews (including a
partial rewrite) was better than all that time since the regressions
were introduced.
So do we want to follow the regular "a few days in 'pu' in case
somebody finds 'oops this trivial change is needed', a week or two
in 'next' for simmering as everybody else, and finally down to
'master'" schedule?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
