Duy Nguyen <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> We would
>>> need to convert or match both '/' and '\' in "to/foo" case because of
>>> Windows, so it's not much easier than basename().
>>
>> I never said "easier to implement".  But can this codepath get
>> backslashed paths in the first place?  I somehow thought that
>> normalization would happen a lot before the control reaches here.
>>
>> You'll be calling into fspathcmp() anyway; shouldn't the function
>> know that '/' and '\' are equivalent on some platforms, or is it
>> legal to only call fspathcmp() on a single path component without
>> directory separator?
>
> We still need to calculate the length to compare, which could be
> problematic when utf-8 is involved, or some other encoding. 

Hmph.  I was unaware that fspathcmp() used here does more than
byte-for-byte processing, which would cause problems due to encoding
issues when you hand code the comparison.

+static struct worktree *find_worktree_by_basename(struct worktree **list,
+                                                 const char *base_name)
+{
+       struct worktree *found = NULL;
+       int nr_found = 0;
+
+       for (; *list && nr_found < 2; list++) {
+               char *path = xstrdup((*list)->path);
+               if (!fspathcmp(base_name, basename(path))) {
+                       found = *list;
+                       nr_found++;
+               }
+               free(path);
+       }
+       return nr_found == 1 ? found : NULL;
+}


> If we always split at '/' boundary though (e.g. "abc/def/ghi",
> "def/ghi" or "ghi" but never "ef/ghi") then it should be ok.

Does "basename()" used here know '/' and '\' can both be a directory
separator, or does worktree->path have a normalized representation
of the path, i.e. '/' is the only directory separator?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to