On 06/09/2016 01:46 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 07:13 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> [...]
> Thanks for all your great comments!
Junio,
Given that ref-iterators is in next but also that you will soon be
rewinding next, would you like these tweaks as a re-roll of the branch,
as fixup patches to squash on top, or as a new patch series to be
administered separately? I don't think any of these changes are serious
enough to warrant holding up ref-iterators, so it's mostly a question of
what would be most convenient for you.
For the case that you prefer a re-roll, I have pushed it to my fork on
GitHub [1] as branch ref-iterators. This branch squashes in Ramsay's
patch [2], addresses Eric's comments from this thread, and incorporates
the whitespace fix that you made when incorporating v2.
List of changes relative to v2:
* In "refs: introduce an iterator interface":
* Make two vtables private.
* Add a whitespace fix from Junio's mh/ref-iterators.
* In "dir_iterator: new API for iterating over a directory tree":
* Add and improve some comments and docstrings.
* Fix some formatting problems.
* Use a for rather than a while loop in `dir_iterator_abort()` to
improve the clarity.
* Warn on failures of `opendir()`, `readdir()`, and `closedir()`
that can't be explained as a simple race.
* In "for_each_reflog(): reimplement using iterators", make the vtable
private.
If you'd prefer a separate series, let me know and I'll prepare that.
Michael
[1] https://github.com/mhagger/git
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/296801
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
