First, sorry for not having this message threaded: I'm not subscribed to the list and haven't found a way to get a Message-Id from gmane.
I just wanted to ask, as an end-user highly relying on commit signatures, a few questions as to the migration away from SHA-1. SHA-1 already suffers from a freestart collision attack. Based on what I understand of the object model of git, a chosen-prefix collision attack (perhaps somewhat improved) is enough to make reviewers accept a patch, sign it, and then swap the innocuous-looking patch for an evil-doing one -- which *will be signed*. As for the issue about code checking being an easier entrypoint (Theodore Ts'o, 2016-04-14 22:40:51 GMT), in a use case of mine there is a repo with my dotfiles on an untrusted server. Yet I download them and am able to execute them without fear because each commit is PGP-signed with my key. The point being that code checking is not even a possible entrypoint in some cases, so SHA-1 seems to be(come) the weakest link. So, I don't think it is possible to disagree with Jeff King when he wrote his 2016-04-12 23:15:19 GMT email. Peter Anvin (2016-04-14 17:28:50 GMT) gets a point in that there is no need to hurry (chosen-prefix collisions may be still quite a long way, even though there is no guesswork in these matters), and quality is important. Yet Jeff King's proposal (2016-04-12 23:42:52 GMT), amended by Junio Hamano (2016-04-13 01:03:02 GMT) and himself (2016-04-13 01:36:32 GMT) seem to have met no opposition. So, my questions to the git team: * Is there a consensus, that git should migrate away from SHA-1 before it gets a collision attack, because it would mean chosen-prefix collision isn't far away and people wouldn't have the time to upgrade? * Is there a consensus, that Peter Anvin's amended transition plan is the way to go? * If the two conditions above are fulfilled, has work started on it yet? (I guess as Brian Carlson had started his work 9 weeks ago and he was speaking about working on it on the week-end he should have finished it now, so excluding this) * If the two first conditions are fulfilled, is there anything I could do to help this transition? (including helping Brian if his work hasn't actually ended yet) Sorry for bringing up again a subject that seems to be quite recurrent, and for this long block of text, Leo Gaspard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
