"Philip Oakley" <philipoak...@iee.org> writes: > ..., I was wondering > if an alternative would be to refer to it via [use the headings of] > it's notation, i.e. "the 'two-dot' range notation" (or 'syntax' is > that is preferred), and the "three-dot symmetric difference notation".
That's a lot more sensible pair of headings, I would think. > The existing explanatory text can stand as is, but they would now have > a section for readers to find. > > Or should I just drop this? I like the approach to separate them into clearly marked sections. I primarily was reacting to the "single-sided" which nobody would understand. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
