Hi Junio,
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> * jc/renormalize-merge-kill-safer-crlf (2016-07-12) 2 commits
> - merge: avoid "safer crlf" during recording of merge results
I like the verbose commit message, it really makes it easier to understand
the issue as well as the solution. As to the diff:
+ ret = add_cache_entry(ce, options);
+ if (refresh) {
Should we really refresh, even if ret < 0?
+ struct cache_entry *nce;
+
+ nce = refresh_cache_entry(ce, CE_MATCH_REFRESH |
CE_MATCH_IGNORE_MISSING);
This line is overly long, but there is a *lot* of precedent for that in
merge-recursive.c, unfortunately. So this is just a remark, not an
objection.
> - convert: unify the "auto" handling of CRLF
I *think* this is a good thing to do. And I also have to admit that the
only thing I can say about that test matrix in t0027 (both pre- and
post-image) is that it is visually mesmerizing. So I cannot even say
whether those changes make sense to me because I cannot wrap my head
around the changes in the tests.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
