On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> As an alternative solution to your problem, you could of course avoid all
> conditional includes. Simply by adding the include.path settings
> explicitly to the configs that require them. Now, that would make reasoning
> and trouble-shooting simple, wouldn't it?

I can't. Repos can be created and destroyed often (it's in the
process), and there are many of them. Using a wrong identity (among
other incorrect config settings) is a serious problem and I cannot
guarantee myself that I will never make a mistake, forgetting to
include stuff on new clones.

>> > I still fail to see what use case this would benefit,
>>
>> It allows you to group repos together. The first mail that started all
>> this [1] is one of the use cases: you may want to use one identity in
>> a group of repos, and another identity in some other. I want some
>> more, to use a private key one some repos and another private key on
>> some other. Some more settings may be shareable this way, like coding
>> style-related (trailing spaces or not...)
>>
>> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/273811
>>
>> > and I already start to suspect that the change would open a can of worms 
>> > that might not be desired.
>>
>> You can choose not to use it, I guess.
>
> Sadly, as the maintainer I am unable to share in that luxury of yours.

I need this. And I post it because people may need it too. But if it's
a bad thing, I guess I'll keep this patch on my tree then.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to