W dniu 2016-07-24 o 22:14, Jakub Narębski pisze:
> W dniu 2016-07-24 o 20:36, Lars Schneider pisze:
>> I agree that the name is not ideal. "UseProtocol" as it is would be a
>> boolean.
>> I thought about "persistent" but this name wouldn't convey the scope of the
>> persistency ("persistent for one Git operation" vs. "persistent for many Git
>> operations"). What do you think about the protocol as int version idea
>> described in $gmane/300155 ?
>
> You mean the `protocol` as a config variable name (fully name being
> `filter.<driver>.protocol`), being integer-valued, isn't it? Wouldn't
> `protocolVersion` be a more explicit?
Just throwing out further ideas:
Perhaps make `persistent` string-valued variable, with the only value
supported for now, namely "per-process" / "operation"?
Perhaps require for `pidfile` to be present for it to be daemon,
that is persist for possibly many Git operations. Or allow "daemon"
or "server" value for `persistent`, then?
--
Jakub Narębski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
