cshannon commented on issue #2573: ARTEMIS-2265 Support Federated Queues and Addresses URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2573#issuecomment-470515574 +1 for some of Gary's suggestions, they sound like a good idea as future enhancements. Maybe we can look at making the transport configurable, etc. I am very willing to help out with enhancements as this feature is very exciting. I had actually been experimenting with enhancing clustering the past few months trying to add features or tweak it a bit but I have always thrown it away as I was never happy with how it turned out. Supporting dynamic bridges like 5.x seems like a great solution because often my thoughts were "ok how can I make clustering act more like 5.x " :) What I found, at least for my use case coming from a 5.x setup, is that a clustering setup makes the most sense from the standpoint of high availability and failover as the brokers can be configured to act as a master/slave setup and being tightly coupled on startup and configuration is fine as you want the brokers to act as a pair, especially in the replication case. This setup isn't really ever dynamic so there's no issue like there would be with establishing bridges dynamically. So thanks again @michaelandrepearce for getting this started. This is really going to be a great feature and will I think really help the adoption of people from 5.x who are used to bridging brokers together in the 5.x way and want to continue that without setting up clustering. (Such as myself :) )
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services
