jbertram commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/58#issuecomment-909839143


   > We can't use a web framework, such as Jekyll, and simultaneously not use 
it.
   
   I apologize if my comment communicated this logical fallacy. I'm not saying 
we shouldn't use Jekyll. Clearly we are _already_ doing that. My point was 
simply that we should be circumspect in _how_ we use it, especially with more 
advanced features. If this specific change is really as simple as it's made out 
to be then I don't see a problem with regard to the new complexity. Still, the 
point is worth making to ensure we cover our bases especially given our unique 
context (i.e. a clear history of poor website maintenance).
   
   Might I suggest something like the following?
   ![Screenshot 2021-08-31 at 15-32-20 
ActiveMQ](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1336948/131587391-2c744f10-74cb-4101-ba3d-5cf74cf8df3f.png)
   Noteworthy changes:
   
   - "News" top-level menu item
   - Main banner height slightly reduced to bring subsequent items up a bit
   - Very clear and succinct bulleted list of most recent news items in 
chronological order
       - Decreasing clutter tends to increase readability therefore...
           - Items are simple links which can be followed for more details
           - Redundant "Read More" button is eliminated
       - The list is not immediately after the banner, but is still clearly 
displayed without scrolling; I felt this was a good compromise as I would 
personally prefer it be even further down
   - A bit cleaner visual separation from the surrounding text items
   
   Regardless of the visual design I agree with Robbie that linking to old 
releases from the main page should be avoided. I also don't like the 
page-per-release. I think that each component should have a "latest" page and a 
"past releases" page and that's it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to