cshannon commented on pull request #766: URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/766#issuecomment-1036278898
> Yes I was only talking about reload4j itself, in relation to log4j, that it wasnt a change in behaviour to pass reload4j on as log4j was already being passed on via the 'linkedin'/zookeeper bits before. > > As the new JIRA didnt mention it, I didnt realise the point actually centred more around the slf4j bit. I'd agree that as the slf4j-log4j12 equivalent wasnt being passed on before the slf4j-reload4j equivalent shouldnt be now. Ok so maybe we just drop the slf4j part and keep reload4j and let people exclude if they want. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
