gemmellr commented on pull request #662: URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/662#issuecomment-1047851751
I would say so, if the idea is to not use Log4J 1.x, then there should be no trace of it. Those bits should be using Log4J 2 (via the 1.2 bridge), or a less apealling alternative would be subbing in reload4j, but that doesnt really make sense given the context. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
