gemmellr commented on code in PR #4782:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4782#discussion_r1476493248


##########
artemis-parent/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,2074 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<!--
+  Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+  contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
+  this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+  The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+  (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+  the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+  http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+  limitations under the License.
+-->
+<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";>
+   <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
+   <parent>
+      <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
+      <artifactId>artemis-pom</artifactId>
+      <version>2.33.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
+   </parent>
+
+   <artifactId>artemis-parent</artifactId>

Review Comment:
   Something else to consider might be whether we instead introduced a new name 
at the root pom (e.g ```artemis-project```, ```artemis-parent```...could still 
use e.g build-parent here later) and leave this as ```artemis-pom``` for now, 
perhaps avoiding the change of effective content breaking anyone...e.g some 
might be [ab]using it as an import due to lack of specific bom.
   
   (or also like it breaks the now-standalone Examples build, which currently 
still uses it as a parent as it always had...in part as that was the minimal 
change during their recent move, but also that there was no bom yet and I didnt 
want to import the parent during the move or duplicate all the management).
   
   EDIT: used highlight to suppress the erroneous Jira auto-linking :)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to