cshannon commented on PR #1172:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1172#issuecomment-2015372280

   My initial comments of not to include it were because I thought you meant 
with Tech Preview as it's just for testing, etc and not really intended for 
users yet. If your intent is for users to try it out and then I think it would 
be ok to merge if we mark it as experimental/beta in the code itself besides 
just the documentation.
   
   As I already stated, I want to look at refactoring all of the `TaskRunner` 
usage, so it's possible the final result of this looks completely different and 
I just didn't want to merge something in that was a preview/testing feature 
that might break users.
   
   Maybe we could add something similar to @Beta annotation that Guava has to 
mark it as a preview feature and subject to breaking changes or removal as we 
don't know how it will go and I don't want to add it in if we can't get rid of 
it later.
   
   My guess is by the time we hit AMQ 7.0 it would certainly be considered 
stable but could be earlier if we did work on the threading.
   
   I suppose the other result of this change is it requires JDK 21 to build 
going forward for releases which I'm not sure how I feel about. The modules are 
optional but obviously we need to build them if we plan to release them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to