gemmellr commented on code in PR #5303:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5303#discussion_r1811012462
##########
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/ActiveMQServerLogger.java:
##########
@@ -35,30 +32,26 @@
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.config.Configuration;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.io.IOCallback;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.io.SequentialFile;
-import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.paging.cursor.PagePosition;
-import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.paging.cursor.PageSubscription;
-import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.persistence.OperationContext;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.Packet;
import
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.protocol.core.impl.wireformat.BackupReplicationStartFailedMessage;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.remoting.impl.netty.TransportConstants;
-import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.routing.targets.Target;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.Bridge;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.BridgeImpl;
import
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.impl.ClusterConnectionImpl;
import
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.cluster.quorum.ServerConnectVote;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ServerSessionImpl;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.management.Notification;
+import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.routing.targets.Target;
+import org.apache.activemq.artemis.logs.BundleFactory;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.logs.annotation.LogBundle;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.logs.annotation.LogMessage;
-import org.apache.activemq.artemis.logs.BundleFactory;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.remoting.Connection;
-import org.w3c.dom.Node;
/**
* Logger Code 22
*/
-@LogBundle(projectCode = "AMQ", regexID = "22[0-9]{4}")
+@LogBundle(projectCode = "AMQ", regexID = "22[0-9]{4}", retiredIDs = "221026,
221052, 222012, 222020, 222021, 222022, 222024, 222027, 222028, 222029, 222052,
222071, 222078, 222079, 222083, 222084, 222088, 222090, 222102, 222128, 222134,
222135, 222152, 222159, 222163, 222167, 222170, 222171, 222182, 222192, 222193,
222204, 222252, 222255, 222257, 224001, 224002, 224003, 224005, 224035, 224100,
224121, 224127, 222260, 222259, 222288")
Review Comment:
Regardless whether we separated it out, its not clear that there is a
benefit to using String rather than e.g. just int[] ?
If trying to split it out, it would just be another annotation to process.
Processors can handle any they like really. In this case it handles one main
annotation, which it looks up at the start of the processing for each of the
indicated interface/class that were found marked (and then in processing each,
further handles multiple other related annotations found on methods). It could
just look up another annotation from the class/interface. Or Many, if multiples
were allowed (might help combat ultra-long lists getting too ugly).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
