cshannon commented on PR #1344: URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1344#issuecomment-2520607472
> I think EE10 makes more sense. However, if we jump straight to EE10, I think we’d need to rev to 7.x. > > Staying with EE9 would allow us to get to Jetty 12 in 6.x minor release Looking at it in more detail and reading https://jetty.org/docs/jetty/12/operations-guide/deploy/index.html , I don't think it's compatible after all for EE9 and EE10 when embedded. EE10 removes some stuff from the API and i took a look at the Jetty 12 download and they actually package all 3 versions of both the API and modules separately (EE8, EE9, EE10) and each war file is isolated for deployment so you can run independently. This of course does not work for something embedded. So we can probably stick with EE9 until 7.x. I guess if someone wants to use EE10 and with an embedded version of AMQ they could probably still do so as long as they were not using anything that relied on the EE9 stuff (any of the AMQ websockets or servlets, etc) and they would have to exclude the EE9 transitive dependencies from AMQ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: gitbox-h...@activemq.apache.org For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
