jbertram commented on code in PR #5848:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/5848#discussion_r2243585616
##########
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/impl/ServerConsumerImpl.java:
##########
@@ -526,7 +526,11 @@ public void proceedDeliver(MessageReference reference)
throws Exception {
}
} finally {
pendingDelivery.countDown();
- callback.afterDelivery();
+ synchronized (lock) {
Review Comment:
I see your point. However, I don't see any harm in specifying `volatile`
whereas the benefit is that it's more "correct" and ostensibly would make more
sense to folks reading the code.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@activemq.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gitbox-h...@activemq.apache.org
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact
