mustafaiman commented on a change in pull request #1670:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/1670#discussion_r525396299



##########
File path: 
ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/NullScanTaskDispatcher.java
##########
@@ -159,21 +165,46 @@ private void processTableScans(MapWork work, 
Set<TableScanOperator> tableScans)
           } else {
             managedEmptyPathMap.put(path, false);
           }
+        } else {
+          numberOfUnmanagedPaths++;
         }
       }
     }
 
+    int fetcherPoolParallelism = Math.min(MAXIMUM_ASYNC_STATUS_FETCHER_COUNT, 
(int)Math.sqrt(numberOfUnmanagedPaths));
+    ForkJoinPool pool = null;
+    if (fetcherPoolParallelism > 1) { // dont create thread pool for a few 
partitions

Review comment:
       No, in that case lookup will happen in another thread than calling 
thread. So we would pay the price of creating a new thread for no benefit. This 
check ensures that we do the lookup in calling thread when creating a new 
thread is not justified performance wise.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to