aasha commented on a change in pull request #2235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/2235#discussion_r625495710



##########
File path: 
standalone-metastore/metastore-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/metastore/ObjectStore.java
##########
@@ -5095,14 +5095,18 @@ public Partition alterPartition(String catName, String 
dbname, String name, List
       Iterator<List<String>> part_val_itr = part_vals.iterator();
       Set<MColumnDescriptor> oldCds = new HashSet<>();
       Ref<MColumnDescriptor> oldCdRef = new Ref<>();
+      MTable table = null;
       for (Partition tmpPart: newParts) {
         List<String> tmpPartVals = part_val_itr.next();
         if (writeId > 0) {
           tmpPart.setWriteId(writeId);
         }
         oldCdRef.t = null;
+        if (table == null) {
+          table = this.getMTable(tmpPart.getCatName(), tmpPart.getDbName(), 
tmpPart.getTableName());
+        }
         Partition result = alterPartitionNoTxn(
-            catName, dbname, name, tmpPartVals, tmpPart, queryWriteIdList, 
oldCdRef);

Review comment:
       Do we need the alterPartitionNoTxn with the following signature anymore
   
   private Partition alterPartitionNoTxn(String catName, String dbname, String 
name,
         List<String> part_vals, Partition newPart, String validWriteIds, 
Ref<MColumnDescriptor> oldCd)
   
   Even single alter partition can use the same call with the table already 
passed. Will not result to any improvement but just a clean up of the code.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@hive.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gitbox-h...@hive.apache.org

Reply via email to