hsnusonic commented on a change in pull request #3006:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/3006#discussion_r823249043



##########
File path: service/src/java/org/apache/hive/service/auth/jwt/JWTValidator.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.hive.service.auth.jwt;
+
+import com.nimbusds.jose.JOSEException;
+import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSHeader;
+import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSObject;
+import com.nimbusds.jose.JWSVerifier;
+import com.nimbusds.jose.crypto.factories.DefaultJWSVerifierFactory;
+import com.nimbusds.jose.jwk.AsymmetricJWK;
+import com.nimbusds.jose.jwk.JWK;
+import com.nimbusds.jwt.JWTClaimsSet;
+import com.nimbusds.jwt.SignedJWT;
+import org.apache.hadoop.hive.conf.HiveConf;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+import javax.security.sasl.AuthenticationException;
+import java.io.IOException;
+import java.security.Key;
+import java.text.ParseException;
+import java.util.Date;
+import java.util.List;
+
+public class JWTValidator {
+
+  private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(JWTValidator.class.getName());
+  private final URLBasedJWKSProvider jwksProvider;
+  private static final DefaultJWSVerifierFactory verifierFactory = new 
DefaultJWSVerifierFactory();
+
+  public JWTValidator(HiveConf conf) throws IOException, ParseException {
+    this.jwksProvider = new URLBasedJWKSProvider(conf);
+  }
+
+  public String validateJWTAndExtractUser(String signedJwt) throws 
ParseException, AuthenticationException {
+    final SignedJWT parsedJwt = SignedJWT.parse(signedJwt);
+    List<JWK> matchedJWKS = jwksProvider.getJWKs(parsedJwt.getHeader());
+
+    // verify signature
+    for (JWK matchedJWK : matchedJWKS) {
+      try {
+        JWSVerifier verifier = getVerifier(parsedJwt.getHeader(), matchedJWK);
+        if (parsedJwt.verify(verifier)) {
+          break;
+        }
+      } catch (JOSEException e) {
+        LOG.info("Failed to verify JWT {} by JWK {} because {}", 
parsedJwt.getHeader(), matchedJWK.getKeyID(),
+            e.getMessage());
+      }
+    }
+    if (parsedJwt.getState() != JWSObject.State.VERIFIED) {
+      throw new AuthenticationException("Failed to verify JWT signature");
+    }
+
+    // verify claims
+    JWTClaimsSet claimsSet = parsedJwt.getJWTClaimsSet();
+    Date expirationTime = claimsSet.getExpirationTime();
+    if (expirationTime != null) {
+      Date now = new Date();
+      if (now.after(expirationTime)) {
+        throw new AuthenticationException("JWT has been expired");
+      }
+    }
+
+    // We assume the subject of claims is the query user
+    return claimsSet.getSubject();
+  }
+
+  private static JWSVerifier getVerifier(JWSHeader header, JWK jwk) throws 
JOSEException {
+    Key key = null;
+    if (jwk instanceof AsymmetricJWK) {

Review comment:
       @sourabh912 
   1. This is for security. I think we should use asymmetric algorithm (public 
key) to verify a token, instead of secret key. Using a secret key to verify 
means anybody can get key and sign the JWT.
   2. This method is not specific to a instance, but I checked again the 
library and realized that `Verifier` only depends on the key. With that being 
said, maybe we can put them in a map and reuse them. *UPDATE: keeping them in 
map might be an overkill, and the `Verfifier` object itself is pretty 
lightweight.
   
   Let me know if these don't make sense.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to