difin opened a new pull request, #6690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/6690

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/HowToContribute
     2. Ensure that you have created an issue on the Hive project JIRA: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HIVE/summary
     3. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
     4. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP]HIVE-XXXXX:  Your PR title ...'.
     5. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     6. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     7. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
   
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   Added guardrails for Iceberg partition-scoped compaction on tables that have 
undergone partition spec evolution, where the same partition path can match 
more than one historical spec. This scenario is possible with partition schema 
evolution with Iceberg v1 tables. Also, added more tests for partition schema 
evolution that cover the following cases: unpartitioned to partitioned , spec 
change, back to unpartitioned.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   Iceberg compaction matches partitions by path and with Iceberg v1 tables 
that undergone partition schema evolution this can cause issues.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description, screenshot and/or a reproducable 
example to show the behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Hive versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   Yes, Iceberg compaction may be refused for Iceberg v1 tables that undergone 
partition schema evolution in case more than one partition matches the same 
path.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   -->
   Added more partition evolution cases to existing q-tests; Added new test 
class `TestIcebergTableUtil` that tests `IcebergTableUtil.getPartitionSpec()` 
against a real v1 Iceberg table built with `HadoopTables` and evolved via the 
Iceberg API: ambiguous resolution after repeated spec changes (identity → 
unpartitioned → identity), a unique match after a single spec change, and 
failure when no spec matches the partition path.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to