schneems opened a new pull request, #340:
URL: https://github.com/apache/yetus/pull/340

   The Apache 2.0 license on the website shows that it ends after "END OF TERMS 
AND CONDITIONS" https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
   
   <img width="1401" alt="387383537-f56c8594-5c32-41d5-a5b7-f4a587125ca2" 
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ca29c9a4-b520-401f-9e6c-ce2b3464e942";>
   
   This text exists because it's been mistakenly copied and pasted from 
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt where it includes placeholder 
text and the intent seems to be reproducing the application instructions as 
seen on https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 rather than as text that's 
intended to be included in the license.
   
   The text removed in this PR diverges slightly from the text on 
https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#apply
   
   > How to apply the Apache License to your work
   >
   > Include a copy of the Apache License, typically in a file called LICENSE, 
in your work, and consider also including a NOTICE file that references the 
License.
   >
   > To apply the Apache License to specific files in your work, attach the 
following boilerplate declaration, replacing the fields enclosed by brackets 
"[]" with your own identifying information. (Don't include the brackets!) 
Enclose the text in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. We also 
recommend that you include a file or class name and description of purpose on 
the same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier identification 
within third-party archives.
   
   The text on the website ⬆️  seems to indicate that placing the Apache 2.0 
license text in a `LICENSE` is sufficient for a project. The text given in the 
text file ⬇️  does not mention a LICENSE file and instead seems to imply that 
the full text of the Apache 2.0 license is not required, but use the 
"boilerplate" after swapping out the placeholders.
   
   Looking at other high profile projects that use the Apache 2.0 license it 
looks like their understanding matches mine, here's Rust 
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fda68927475070696fcc9d1f5c9c990f0e1af87a/LICENSE-APACHE.
 Here's a discussion from 5 years ago on whether to remove the appendix from 
there https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67734.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscr...@yetus.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to