github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [datafusion-54] bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [datafusion-54] bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [datafusion-54] bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] Start testing what will be DataFusion 54.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] Start testing what will be DataFusion 54.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] Start testing what will be DataFusion 54.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Upgrade to DataFusion 54 [do not merge] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: replace 4 hardcoded planning slots with extensible LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [TUI] Change the key binding for job's plans [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Change the key binding for job's plans [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group in /native with 3 updates [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group in /native with 3 updates [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add ASYNC keyword support for CREATE INDEX [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ASYNC keyword support for CREATE INDEX [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ASYNC keyword support for CREATE INDEX [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add quote-style parameter for CSV options [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add quote style and trimming to csv writier [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add quote style and trimming to csv writier [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add PostgreSQL `CREATE/ALTER TEXT SEARCH` DDL Parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: download tpch data without docker [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Poor performance of parquet pushdown with offset [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(unparser): Keep inner join `Filter → TableScan` predicates to `WHERE` instead of moving to `JOIN ON` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(unparser): Keep inner join `Filter → TableScan` predicates to `WHERE` instead of moving to `JOIN ON` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(unparser): Keep inner join `Filter → TableScan` predicates to `WHERE` instead of moving to `JOIN ON` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(unparser): Keep inner join `Filter → TableScan` predicates to `WHERE` instead of moving to `JOIN ON` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: InterleaveExec fallback to UnionExec when children partitioning diverges [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] InterleaveExec::with_new_children panics when optimizer rewrites change children's partitioning [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fix elapsed_compute metric in ParquetSink to report encoding time only [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: Improve InListExpr types, flatten dict haystacks and validate in try_new_from_array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve InListExpr types, flatten dict haystacks and validate in try_new_from_array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve InListExpr types, flatten dict haystacks and validate in try_new_from_array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve InListExpr types, flatten dict haystacks and validate in try_new_from_array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve InListExpr types, flatten dict haystacks and validate in try_new_from_array [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Improve InListExpr types, flatten dict haystacks and validate in try_new_from_array [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs(optimizer): add generated optimizer rules reference [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: use Arc::unwrap_or_clone in more places [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: use Arc::unwrap_or_clone in more places [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: use Arc::unwrap_or_clone in more places [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: use Arc::unwrap_or_clone in more places [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: use Arc::unwrap_or_clone in more places [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: use Arc::unwrap_or_clone in more places [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: use Arc::unwrap_or_clone in more places [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: add Spark 4.0 / JDK 21 profile [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement bounded DP join reordering [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Add existence (semi / anti ) benchmarks hashjoin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Add existence (semi / anti ) benchmarks hashjoin [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add existence (semi / anti ) benchmarks for hashjoinexec [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Add existence (semi / anti ) benchmarks for hashjoinexec [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: implement convert_to_state for SparkAvg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: implement convert_to_state for SparkAvg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: implement convert_to_state for SparkAvg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: implement convert_to_state for SparkAvg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: implement convert_to_state for SparkAvg [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: implement convert_to_state for SparkAvg [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [TUI] Visualize the job's stages data [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [TUI] Visualize the job's stages data [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [TUI] Visualize the job's stages data [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [TUI] Visualize the job's stages data [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [TUI] Visualize the job's stages data [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages