github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Show job's stages and their tasks [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] tpch examples: rewrite queries idiomatically and embed reference SQL [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tpch examples: rewrite queries idiomatically and embed reference SQL [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] tpch examples: rewrite queries idiomatically and embed reference SQL [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: Implement physical execution of uncorrelated scalar subqueries [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add support for array_position expression [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] Support Spark expression: length_of_json_array [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Feature] Support Spark expression: array_position [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add PostgreSQL EXCLUDE constraint parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add PostgreSQL EXCLUDE constraint parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add PostgreSQL EXCLUDE constraint parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add PostgreSQL EXCLUDE constraint parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add PostgreSQL EXCLUDE constraint parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add PostgreSQL EXCLUDE constraint parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: add README section for AI coding assistants [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add README section for AI coding assistants [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: add internal markdown link check [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Teradata dialect [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: fold Limit/Sort into outer SELECT when Projection claims Aggregate through them [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: use fastrange instead of modulo for hash partition assignment (up to 1.15x improvement) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add StatisticsContext parameter to partition_statistics [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf: avoid redundant columnar shuffle when both parent and child are non-Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid redundant columnar shuffle when both parent and child are non-Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid redundant columnar shuffle when both parent and child are non-Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid redundant columnar shuffle when both parent and child are non-Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf: avoid redundant columnar shuffle when both parent and child are non-Comet [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [datafusion-54] bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [datafusion-54] bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: [datafusion-54] bump DataFusion rev to 85e75e2 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] Start testing what will be DataFusion 54.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] Start testing what will be DataFusion 54.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps: [DO NOT MERGE] Start testing what will be DataFusion 54.0 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Upgrade to DataFusion 54 [do not merge] [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: replace 4 hardcoded planning slots with extensible LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: LogicalPlanningPipeline [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] [TUI] Change the key binding for job's plans [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [TUI] Change the key binding for job's plans [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Spark quarter function implementation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Spark quarter function implementation [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group in /native with 3 updates [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group in /native with 3 updates [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add ASYNC keyword support for CREATE INDEX [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ASYNC keyword support for CREATE INDEX [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ASYNC keyword support for CREATE INDEX [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] PostgreSQL: Parse optimizer hints in leading comments [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add quote-style parameter for CSV options [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add quote style and trimming to csv writier [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add quote style and trimming to csv writier [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: leave specialised bench helpers [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: leave specialised bench helpers [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Allow coercion from Binary and LargeBinary into BinaryView [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix: allow coercion from Binary and LargeBinary into BinaryView [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: allow coercion from Binary and LargeBinary into BinaryView [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add PostgreSQL `CREATE/ALTER TEXT SEARCH` DDL Parsing [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(push_down_filter): skip filter revalidation [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore: download tpch data without docker [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Poor performance of parquet pushdown with offset [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pushdown OFFSET to parquet for RG-level skipping [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages