> This really should have been a separate PR, not make a huge PR bigger, 

@elextr Good point, dropped the patch, will post it separately once this is 
merged. 

> and I suspect that the huge PR could have been split in the first place.

The patches are so related that it would be really hard to do. If I knew from 
the very beginning about all the possible problems and knew exactly what needs 
to be addressed, it could have been a much smaller patch set. But rewriting the 
patches now would be a huge amount of work.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/862#issuecomment-170500045

Reply via email to