> +{
> + TMParserMap *map = &parser_map[lang];
> + guint i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < map->size; i++)
> + {
> + TMParserMapEntry *entry = &map->entries[i];
> +
> + if (entry->type == type)
> + return entry->kind;
> + }
> + return '-';
> +}
> +
> +
> +void tm_parser_verify_type_mappings(void)
> Should still be possible to have a separate binary for checking, so long as
> the symbol is public. We could have either that function public, or a
> geany_test_main() that calls a bunch of tests and can be run without a GUI.
> Or something like @codebrainz's idea of something like a self-test option,
> --test that would perform tests and exit (with out without GUI, one could
> probably be emulated somehow with some weird X-faking thingie).
What's the point of the separate testing binary? Or in other words, what's
wrong with the current way the tests are run (already without GUI)? I don't
understand what this is trying to achieve.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/957/files/aea7d7845917843dd6b02e5a8dc9031cabc87a86..5d9376ea801a6e6c3ec22748741362a3a2eff7ac#r66401618
