@elextr well, the problem is that

* many plugins aren't really maintained, even by their maintainers.  That's the 
problem of GP: we want some standard out of it, but maintainers don't 
necessarily answer.  Another approach could be arbitrarily dropping plugins 
when they have something we'd like to fix instead of proposing a fix.
* some are happy we do some of the work.  And that's mostly fine, although some 
should also show more concern :)
* some never answer PRs, neither refusing nor accepting them.  Which is the 
problem here, you probably should have refused it.  It's fairly complex to 
remember not to PR something here but other things there, for which part are 
here (e.g. build system should go on GP, but code changes on upstream, which 
then should be imported back).
So yeah, it might be annoying, I get that.  But maintaining it might mean 
triaging reports, or even backport changes -- or revert them.

So well… hard to please us all :S

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/435#issuecomment-225041736

Reply via email to