> @@ -2234,12 +2232,12 @@ static boolean skipPostArgumentStuff (statementInfo
> *const st,
> {
> switch (c)
> {
> - case ')': break;
> - case ':': skipMemIntializerList (token);break; /*
> ctor-initializer */
> - case '[': skipToMatch ("[]"); break;
> - case '=': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> - case '{': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> - case '}': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> + case ')': break;
> + case ':': skipMemIntializerList (token);break; /*
> ctor-initializer */
> + case '[': skipToMatch ("[]"); break;
> + case '=': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> + case '{': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> + case '}': cppUngetc (c); end = TRUE; break;
> Would it be too hard to do it the other way round and add Vala to uctag's c.c
> so it supports the same set of languages?
Well, the Vala support in *c.c* has known issues and hacks, so I'm not sure
it'd be better to add it in uctags than splitting it up in Geany and add the
split version in uctags.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1160/files/11dcc5e3e5a0014905fbb76457b52991135dc410..9745d470c6288d88b455436a918f92e13e271df4#r73957058
