Patch from https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1177#issuecomment-241438625, 
plus an attempt at considering the current scope (which is likely riddled with 
bad stuff, but still a POC).

I can drop the second (toy) patch if the first is interesting enough, and 
possibly make a separate PR afterward if it's somehow interesting still.  In 
any case, reviewing each commit separately is likely a better approach.

@techee @krogank9
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1188

-- Commit Summary --

  * Add support for scoped calltips
  * FXIME: Attempt at using the current (implicit) scope for symbol scope search

-- File Changes --

    M src/editor.c (155)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1188.patch
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1188.diff

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1188

Reply via email to