I don't see why TM couldn't be improved to support other, AST-based parsers. Sure TM is lacking now but we cna fix that. I don't think it's too much work.
But coming back to this PR. I don't think the proposed query API is affected by the above ideas. It'll always be used to return a list of tags. If the TMTag structure changes for new features or are subtrees instead of plain tags is a different story. So, what needs to be done to get this merged? @b4n @techee @codebrainz ? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1187#issuecomment-243003488
