> In terms of its use-case, isn't the whole point of the GIR stuff @kugel- is > doing to allow dynamic binding from languages like Python or Js without the > compiled hand carved bindings? So that dynamically bound code needs to be > able to check whats available to it.
Sure, but if there's no use case for the C API, wouldn't it be better as a GI/Peasy thing? But anyway, as said in theory it's nice, so if we add some dynamic stuff in the future it can be useful then. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1406#issuecomment-282296225
