> @jeremiaskleer its the normal policy of Geany to not accept hand edits to 
> `geany.glade` because they tend to cause Glade to make many unrelated changes 
> the next time its used. One of the Geany contributors even made changes to 
> Glade to minimise the changes it makes, but that only works when its reading 
> a file it wrote IIUC.
> 
> And yes I _totally_ agree with you about needing to compile your own Glade 
> 3.8.5 or 3.8.6, I won't either, but until support for GTK2 is removed from 
> Geany, the Glade version can't be advanced to one thats available in 
> repositories.
> 
> But since the functionality is available in the "autoclose" plugin there may 
> not be much incentive to add this, but lets see if anybody tests it and 
> reports its working.

I tried compiling glade 3.8.6 with no success within 1 hour. I stopped. Maybe 
someone already having glade in correct version could help.

I don't agree with the last point: I see no reason for not fixing a feature in 
Geany, in my opinion not usable, because it can be circumvented with a plugin, 
although there is a easy fix, already prepared.
Of course I am biased as I invested hours in understanding, fixing, and 
preparing a fix. I love Geany, I use it in on every computer I run. I 
circumvent enterprise firewalls and software policies just to install Geany to 
use it everyday. For a while I was compiling and preparing ubuntu-packages and 
providing them in a repository when Geany in the official repositories where 
behind the current development.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2122#issuecomment-483779135

Reply via email to