> new names would be nice, but whilst we keep exposing Geany internals we > should leave the names the same otherwise we have to change all uses to the > new name.
You misunderstood me, I meant better names for these **new** functions, before they're published into the API for the first time, so we don't need to rename/alias them later or break any plugins that start using them. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/2234#issuecomment-518439333
