Speaking as someone who uses and likes meson because its a _developer_ build tool, (AT isn't it says so right on its docs, its a distribution tool). Unfortunately any alternative probably needs a "try it and see" approach to finding if its faster than AT, because its likely to only be a speed improvement for something Geanys size if it runs fewer commands (which it may do for the library stuff). I don't think, but it needs to be proved, that there will be much speed improvement due to filesystem metadata access that `make` does that `ninja` doesn't for Geany (but its very important for say chromium).
@b4n: > distribution tarballs `ninja dist` according to the meson site As for exotics, well, if they want Geany they can contribute a build system, its all open source. IIRC somebody did offer to make a meson port in the past, but I can't remember who (and my googling didn't find it either, @codebrainz google services might :). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/2305#issuecomment-531737700
