@techee commented on this pull request.

Looks good to me apart from the minor comments above.

> @@ -1843,28 +1843,9 @@ static gint find_start_bracket(ScintillaObject *sci, 
> gint pos)
 }
 
 
-static gchar *find_calltip(const gchar *word, GeanyFiletype *ft)
+static GPtrArray *update_tags_for_constructor_calltip(GPtrArray *tags, 
GeanyFiletype *ft,
+                                                                               
                          TMTag *tag, const gchar *constructor_method)

I think it's a bit confusing for the reader of the code to see what this 
function does - it does a bit too many things. I think it would be better to 
call it something like `get_constructor_tags()` without passing the `tags` 
argument to it so this function would return `GPtrArray *` when constructors 
are found or NULL otherwise. Then, later, when this function is called, the 
code would look like
```C
GPtrArray *constructor_tags = get_constructor_tags(ft, tag, constructor_method);
if (constructor_tags)
{
    g_ptr_array_free(tags, TRUE);
    tags = constructor_tags;
}
```

> @@ -1886,6 +1867,53 @@ static gchar *find_calltip(const gchar *word, 
> GeanyFiletype *ft)
                        g_ptr_array_free(constructor_tags, TRUE);
                }
        }
+       return tags;
+}
+
+
+static void update_tag_for_construtor_calltip(const gchar *word, TMTag *tag, 
const gchar **tag_name,

I would call this `update_tag_name_and_scope_for_calltip()` or something 
similar because `update_tag` feels like it changes the `TMTag`.

> @@ -1886,6 +1867,53 @@ static gchar *find_calltip(const gchar *word, 
> GeanyFiletype *ft)
                        g_ptr_array_free(constructor_tags, TRUE);
                }
        }
+       return tags;
+}
+
+
+static void update_tag_for_construtor_calltip(const gchar *word, TMTag *tag, 
const gchar **tag_name,
+                                                                               
          const gchar **scope, const gchar *constructor_method)

I'd suggest moving `constructor_method` in front of `tag_name` and `scope` so 
the input arguments are in front of the output arguments.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3334#pullrequestreview-1225118556
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3334/review/[email protected]>

Reply via email to