Oh, __NO__unused_parameters, yeah. > we could also sprinkle the code with G_GNUC_UNUSED all over the place; but is > it worth it?
Well, thats GUNC only IIUC, unlike G_NORETURN which supports multiple compilers. So probably not. (unless "somebody" created b4nlib and B_UNUSED :-) Of course C++ indicates it with no name on the parameter declaration, but does C follow that sensible strategy? NO!! C23 adds ugly `[[maybe_unused]]` to function parameters as well ... sigh [end rant] -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/3689#issuecomment-1817239935 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/issues/3689/[email protected]>
