> not using --library=gtk See #1197 for why its needed
> Anyway, what do you guys think? Is it good? Are there too many > false-positives? Should the suppressions be moved back to AM_CPPCHECKFLAGs > not to alter the code, although it makes it harder to maintain? ... should we switch to C++ where its all built into the compiler and doesn't need another tool to apply spurious checks. I'm serious, remember GCC has switched to C++ even though its a C codebase. > I'm not sure it has any value… does it? Oh how tempting ..... nah, I'll be nice. :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: My 2c is that most plugins are so poorly maintained that if you add cppchecking that actually checks much you will be the one making the patches. You are just adding to your workload. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1346#issuecomment-2087681945 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany-plugins/pull/1346/[email protected]>
