> Then, I would probably try to implement a python-lsp plugin in python, or do > you have a better idea?
I'd suggest having a look at `plugins/demopluginext.c` that this PR adds and reimplementing it in Python. Then you can add the additional functions from this interface (for @elextr - pointers to functions assigned to struct members ;-). You don't really have to properly implement them, just add some `print()`s to make sure these functions are called and that the parameters passed to these functions can be accessed. > I don' think this needs to block this PR, if you're OK that the API may need > to be changed after the fact. I would actually prefer that even if it means some additional modifications later. @b4n How does the PR look to you? OK to merge? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3849#issuecomment-2221343524 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3849/[email protected]>
