> I agree in theory that's something that looks nice, and I wanted to try out > at some point -- but it's not a trivial task. IIRC @techee doesn't love it > because it's unnecessay (code and memory overhead is low) and inefficient > (loading overhead and management is not negligible), but well :)
Well, the main reason I don't love it because I think there's a better way to handle this: > Built in: physically compiled into Geany, lexer if used, parser if used, > added to a number of other functions throughout Geany for example > highlighting_is_string_style() or highlighting_is_comment_style() or > editor_get_filetype_at_line() or lexer_has_braces() and many more. A user has > to get a recompiled Geany to use a new filetype, so effectively at a new > release. I would prefer to have all these settings configured dynamically in a config file at which point _everyone_ (who doesn't know C and how to create the DLL) would be able to experiment with the settings and create a filetype. Of course this requires that there's the necessary lexer in Geany. We could handle it in two ways: 1. Include all the lexilla lexers (but possibly including unnecessary code and making the binary too big) 2. Include lexers on demand, or precisely, when someone asks for some language support and the lexer exists in lexilla, add it and say "we did our job, it's your turn to create the necessary configuration". Even if the guy actually doesn't do anything, the lexer could stay in case someone does it in the future. This will still make the the binary much smaller than in (1) and we'd know we include lexers for languages for which there's at least a remote interest. For ctags parsers I think we are in a better position to get the configuration right so better if we do it by ourselves (and I think the hard-coded configuration is just fine here, I wouldn't make users mess with that much). Also, the ctags features are now somewhat duplicated by LSP so ctags support might not be so critical for users if the LSP server exists. So I'd spend the limited efforts we have on making it possible to add language support to everyone by the means of config files rather than the few people who know C, the target language they want to add, study Geany API, and manage to create the DLL - at the end I'm afraid it will be just us ;-) (Also consider the extra API/ABI surface to maintain when such loadable language support libraries are introduced.) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/3970#issuecomment-2395578384 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/issues/3970/[email protected]>
