eht16 left a comment (geany/geany#4223) >We can ask for signatures on two different repos / two workflows, one >for Geany and one for Geany-Plugins, I don't see reason why they won't >give us both (I didn't know that the two are released separately).
Sounds good. I think if possible it is better when we keep Geany and G-P independent. For the UCRT64 migration: yeah, let's postpone this to after 2.1. I hear a nice, friendly voice in my mind warning about last minute changes before a release :). I didn't follow the changes in detail yet but I'd say maybe squash all the commits together or to just a few commits and then we could merge it soon. If it's not yet alright, we can still improve it after it has been merged, as long as the SignPath process can keep going. Same goes for https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1408. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4223#issuecomment-2981843648 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/4223/c2981843...@github.com>
