b4n left a comment (geany/geany#4348)

I agree, its just that it's one of those things that look iniquitous but might 
have subtle weird consequences (proof being the current situation). I trust you 
so I'm optimistic it will only be an improvement, but I'd still like some 
further testing 🙂 

I'm also wondering if we shouldn't try and merge most part of `new()` and 
`open()` for 2.2, it looks both awfully similar and different. But that's 
likely not gonna be trivial, if it's actually a good idea at all.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4348#issuecomment-3012814438
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/4348/c3012814...@github.com>

Reply via email to