b4n left a comment (geany/geany#4465) Also, it seems a bit tricky if not problematic to use flatpak for this, see e.g. https://github.com/flathub/org.geany.Geany/blob/master/wrapper/ide-first-run.txt#L22.
Also, looking at [org.geany.Geany.yml](https://github.com/flathub/org.geany.Geany/blob/master/org.geany.Geany.yml) it seems to bundle a lot of things. If that's what's needed to get things working, I'm a bit skeptical. Admittedly a few things could potentially be adjusted on the Geany build/config[^1] to e.g. not require `xterm` or a `evince` wrapper, but it still seem a bit problematic that it e.g. bundles WebKit. Maybe this all can be improved, but the current state makes me think it's not gonna be something we'll want to take under our wing. I'm fine getting counter-arguments and seeing potential improvements, but as-is I'm not convinced. [^1]: Patching (or providing a default config) could replace `xterm` with some more compatible Flatpak terminal, adjusting to use `open` directly, or changing the default use of native dialogs. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/4465#issuecomment-3591692051 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/issues/4465/[email protected]>
