cyb70289 commented on issue #6986:

   @pitrou @wesm 
   Oops, I only checked case "BitmapReader" from benchmark 
 Obviously it's not enough.
   I compared all cases just now and see huge performance drop from below 4 
   Before this patch:
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/32768/1                 563496 ns       563260 ns         
1243 bytes_per_second=55.4806M/s
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/131072/1               2219810 ns      2218984 ns         
 318 bytes_per_second=56.3321M/s
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/32768/2                 561738 ns       561467 ns         
1265 bytes_per_second=55.6577M/s
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/131072/2               2246229 ns      2245119 ns         
 305 bytes_per_second=55.6763M/s
   After this patch:
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/32768/1                1653467 ns      1652680 ns         
 422 bytes_per_second=18.9087M/s
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/131072/1               6665501 ns      6661561 ns         
 105 bytes_per_second=18.7644M/s
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/32768/2                1670793 ns      1670246 ns         
 423 bytes_per_second=18.7098M/s
   BenchmarkBitmapAnd/131072/2               6702369 ns      6698957 ns         
 103 bytes_per_second=18.6596M/s
   Before reverting this patch, I would like to understand why it happens.
   BTW: we definitely need continuous benchmark tools to detect these things 

This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:

Reply via email to