emkornfield edited a comment on pull request #7143: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7143#issuecomment-637982850
BTW, with GCC (Clang numbers are generally more favorable to BitRunReader) (Intel hardware) I get the following numbers: ``` BitRunReader/-1 17084 ns 17083 ns 40761 bytes_per_second=28.5828M/s BitRunReader/0 316 ns 316 ns 2208352 bytes_per_second=1.51007G/s BitRunReader/10 3899 ns 3898 ns 179454 bytes_per_second=125.263M/s BitRunReader/25 7548 ns 7548 ns 91984 bytes_per_second=64.6927M/s BitRunReader/50 9519 ns 9518 ns 72676 bytes_per_second=51.3026M/s BitRunReader/60 9203 ns 9202 ns 76441 bytes_per_second=53.0612M/s BitRunReader/75 7116 ns 7115 ns 98615 bytes_per_second=68.6234M/s BitRunReader/99 654 ns 654 ns 1059813 bytes_per_second=747.001M/s ``` ``` BitRunReaderScalar/-1 13243 ns 13242 ns 52663 bytes_per_second=36.8737M/s BitRunReaderScalar/0 4956 ns 4956 ns 140715 bytes_per_second=98.5307M/s BitRunReaderScalar/10 7650 ns 7649 ns 90971 bytes_per_second=63.8322M/s BitRunReaderScalar/25 15947 ns 15946 ns 43569 bytes_per_second=30.6216M/s BitRunReaderScalar/50 23469 ns 23466 ns 29645 bytes_per_second=20.8077M/s BitRunReaderScalar/60 22177 ns 22174 ns 31488 bytes_per_second=22.0202M/s BitRunReaderScalar/75 14378 ns 14376 ns 48980 bytes_per_second=33.9642M/s BitRunReaderScalar/99 5376 ns 5376 ns 130274 bytes_per_second=90.8295M/s ``` ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
