jorisvandenbossche commented on pull request #7545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7545#issuecomment-658004350


   > I'm not sure what to say about the handling of the partition fields. Is it 
ok to accept things as they are for now?
   
   I think that might be OK, yes (it means there is a change in behaviour to no 
longer return partition fields as dictionary type). But, maybe we should at 
least provide the option to get back the old behaviour? With `pyarrow.dataset` 
this is possible, but with the current PR this is not possible in `read_table`.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to