bobtins commented on issue #1877: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1877#issuecomment-1067484158
In this example, it seemed like parsing the table refs wasn't working: ``` ❯ CREATE TABLE sch.tbl AS VALUES (1,2,3); 0 rows in set. Query took 0.032 seconds. ❯ show tables; +---------------+--------------------+------------+------------+ | table_catalog | table_schema | table_name | table_type | +---------------+--------------------+------------+------------+ | datafusion | public | sch.tbl | BASE TABLE | ``` Then I saw a change in datafusion/src/catalog/mod.rs to split the table reference; assuming that fixes it. You said > Personally, im ok with those being follow on steps as im fine with using fully qualified names in queries for now. I'm assuming we will still be able to use simple table names, right? Take what I say with a grain of salt--I'm a little obsessive about keeping things simple, but I don't know the whole history. It sounds like you are making this feature more robust, and that's always good :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
