andygrove commented on issue #2709: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/2709#issuecomment-1149921806
Would it make sense to consider having a separate, optional, `datafusion-arrow2` crate containing a physical planner + operators that uses arrow2? It seems to me that this would be easier to maintain. Maybe @houqp has an opinion on this? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
