thamht4190 commented on a change in pull request #8023: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8023#discussion_r486367648
########## File path: cpp/src/parquet/key_toolkit.h ########## @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +// distributed with this work for additional information +// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance +// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +// +// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +// +// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +// software distributed under the License is distributed on an +// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +// specific language governing permissions and limitations +// under the License. + +#pragma once + +#include <cstdint> +#include <memory> +#include <string> +#include <vector> + +#include "parquet/key_encryption_key.h" +#include "parquet/kms_client.h" +#include "parquet/kms_client_factory.h" +#include "parquet/platform.h" +#include "parquet/two_level_cache_with_expiration.h" + +namespace parquet { +namespace encryption { + +class KeyWithMasterID { + public: + KeyWithMasterID(const std::string& key_bytes, const std::string& master_id) + : key_bytes_(key_bytes), master_id_(master_id) {} + + const std::string& data_key() const { return key_bytes_; } + const std::string& master_id() const { return master_id_; } + + private: + std::string key_bytes_; + std::string master_id_; +}; + +class PARQUET_EXPORT KeyToolkit { + public: + class KmsClientCache { + public: + static KmsClientCache& GetInstance() { + static KmsClientCache instance; Review comment: @ggershinsky I worry that if the cache is a member of `PropertiesDrivenCryptoFactory`, users of API must keep the life time of `PropertiesDrivenCryptoFactory` object after getting `FileEncryptionProperties`/`FileDecryptionProperties`. If they forget that, it will be easy to get a crash in their programs. I prefer to let users manage the life time of the cache themselves and pass it into `PropertiesDrivenCryptoFactory`. Any final decision? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
