nealrichardson commented on PR #13441: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13441#issuecomment-1169404242
> Would it make sense to add one macOS build as that is not covered at all? Or are mac specific failures to rare for that to make sense? macOS specific failures haven't been a big source of surprises on CI (as in, something gets merged that passes CI but breaks a nightly build). My guess why is (1) many of us working on the R bindings develop on macs so catch them locally and (2) if there's a problem in the C++ library, there are macOS C++ jobs that catch them. Whereas the centos-7 and rtools35 jobs (in particular) test things in the C++ library that aren't covered elsewhere. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
