alamb commented on code in PR #2322:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/2322#discussion_r938740733


##########
arrow/src/array/array_dictionary.rs:
##########
@@ -421,14 +421,25 @@ impl<T: ArrowPrimitiveType> fmt::Debug for 
DictionaryArray<T> {
 ///     assert_eq!(maybe_val.unwrap(), orig)
 /// }
 /// ```
-#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
 pub struct TypedDictionaryArray<'a, K: ArrowPrimitiveType, V> {
     /// The dictionary array
     dictionary: &'a DictionaryArray<K>,
     /// The values of the dictionary
     values: &'a V,
 }
 
+// Manually implement `Clone` to avoid `V: Clone` type constraint

Review Comment:
   That rfc doesn't sound quite right (or at least it is a overkill -- like a 🔨 
 for swatting a 🪰  ). All that is needed in this case is to recognize that the 
struct only uses `&V` rather than `V` rather than a way to provide generic 
arguments to macros 😱  
   
   Also, I am firmly of the belief that adding more generics is not the answer 
to most of life's problems 🤣  Maybe because my feeble mind can't handle the 
extra level of indirection



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to